Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
这题说的是有严厉环境措施的国家通常增长都不好 但有一个国家旅行最严厉环境措施却增长最好 可是这并不能说明法规促进增长因为
A这些国家其实是把钱投在其他地方了 这说的是这些国家做了什么事 虽然我没明白他们所干的事和增长有什么关系但我觉得至少比其他选项好 因为B have only moderately strict 这个国家是原文所要谈的吗
C many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth
E states with very weak environmental regulations 这都不是原文所想谈的国家
原文讨论 environmental regulations和economic growth之间的关系，a选项说strictest environmental regulations的那些国家把钱花在哪哪哪 和题目信息无关啊。。我觉得c更合适。各位G友三思。仅供参考。